Cutting Public Support for Groups That Harm American Interests
Time to Stop Funding Groups That Work Against America
The Trump administration has made clear that support for certain liberal groups must end. This follows recent comments from advisors like Stephen Miller on the need to cut resources going to organizations that push harmful policies.
The focus is on groups that receive public money or special access while working to weaken border security and American priorities. This is not about banning private opinions. It is about ending taxpayer support for activities that damage the country.
America First starts with the simple idea that the government exists to serve American citizens first. Every policy and dollar should strengthen the nation rather than weaken it. When groups receive federal grants or contracts to aid illegal immigration or block enforcement, they act against this core principle. The result is a system where outsiders benefit at the direct expense of those who built and pay for the country.
The border situation has reached emergency levels. Record numbers of people have crossed illegally in recent years. Many of these entries were encouraged by networks that include funded organizations offering help with travel, shelter, and legal navigation. These groups create pull factors that keep the flow going. Cutting their support removes incentives that harm national security and order.
American taxpayers carry a heavy load from this situation. Cities across the country have spent billions on housing, food, healthcare, and schooling for recent arrivals. These costs come from local budgets meant for citizens. Schools become overcrowded. Hospitals face strain. Police resources stretch thin. The money could have gone to veterans, infrastructure, or American families in need.
Jobs and wages for working Americans face pressure too. Large scale illegal immigration increases the supply of low skilled labor. This drives down pay in construction, service, and manufacturing sectors. American workers compete against people willing to accept less because they have fewer protections and lower living costs.
Protecting the labor market is a basic America First duty.
Public safety suffers when vetting is weak and enforcement is challenged. Some individuals who entered illegally have committed serious crimes after arrival. Communities report rises in certain offenses tied to the chaos at the border. Funded groups that fight deportation of criminals or sue to limit cooperation between police and federal agents add to the problem. Citizens deserve a government that puts their safety above activist demands.
These organizations often turn to the courts to stop policies supported by elected leaders. They file lawsuits against border walls, deportations, and interior enforcement. Taxpayers fund both sides of the fight through government operations and the grants that sustain the opposing side. This creates a cycle where progress on security is slowed or reversed by legal delays.
Fiscal responsibility demands change. The national debt is already massive. Adding billions more in spending on programs that encourage more illegal entries only deepens the hole. Every dollar sent to groups advancing open border goals is a dollar not available for American roads, defense, or debt reduction. Ending this flow is basic good management of public resources.
National sovereignty means controlling who enters and stays. When outside funded networks influence policy or create facts on the ground through mass movement, that control slips away. America has the right and the duty to decide its own future without interference from organizations aligned with globalist or anti enforcement views.
Other countries enforce their borders strictly without apology. The United States can and must do the same.
Cultural cohesion and social trust erode under sustained high levels of unassimilated illegal immigration. Groups that celebrate division or push policies that favor newcomers over long term residents speed up this process. America has always welcomed legal immigrants who come to join and contribute. Unlimited illegal flows plus activist pressure change that into something different and unstable.
The emergency is real because problems have built up over years. Previous policies created magnets and backlogs. Cities declared themselves sanctuaries and saw direct costs explode.
Fentanyl and other threats crossed with the flows. Trust in institutions dropped when laws seemed optional for some. Restoring order requires removing the support structures that keep the dysfunction going.
Practical steps include auditing all federal grants and contracts tied to migration services. Redirect those funds to citizen priorities like border infrastructure and interior enforcement. Investigate misuse of resources by any organization. Enforce existing laws without external legal interference funded by the public. These actions align with the will of voters who chose stronger borders and America First leadership.
The benefits are straightforward. Secure borders reduce crime risks and resource drains. American workers see better opportunities. Tax dollars stay focused on the people who pay them. National identity and rule of law strengthen when the government stops subsidizing its own opposition. This is not punishment. It is self preservation for the country.
Delay only makes the problems larger. Every month of continued support for groups advancing weak border policies adds to costs, risks, and division.
The Trump administration is right to treat this as urgent. America has the tools and the mandate to act. Ending public support for these efforts puts the nation back on a path of strength and independence.
.
Links:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/
https://www.dhs.gov/
https://www.cbp.gov/
https://www.fairus.org/ (for immigration cost analyses)
https://www.heritage.org/ (for policy research on government spending)
#thebrutaltruthnewspodcast #substack #news #trumppolicies #maga
FAIR USE COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
substack.com/@originalbrutaltruth JULY 2026 The Copyright Laws of the United States recognizes a “fair use” of copyrighted content. The videos and YouTube channel in general may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, parody, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. All video is for educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.